Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Chinese leadership
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> Business
UPDATED: 13:28, April 22, 2005
Banks pay for refusal to freeze assets
font size    

A court in Shanghai ordered two banks to compensate a customer 37,611 yuan (US$4,531) yesterday after he suffered a loss as the lenders refused to freeze his account when he reported the card was lost.

Plaintiff Luo Gang said in the lawsuit that he applied for a Great Wall bankcard and a deposit book from the Changning District subbranch of the Bank of China in September.

On September 6, his briefcase containing a few bankcards, including the Great Wall card and his identification card, was stolen at a restaurant.

After reporting the theft to police, Luo called the banks and asked them to freeze his account.

When he called the 95566 service hot line of the Shanghai branch of the Bank of China, the bank refused to freeze his account. A customer service representative said Luo didn't have phone-bank service privileges.

As a result, 68,062 yuan was stolen from Luo's Great Wall account by the next morning.

Luo filed a lawsuit against the Changning subbranch and the Shanghai branch of the Bank of China to the Huangpu District People's Court, requesting the lenders cover his loss.

"The Changning subbranch didn't inform me when it issued the card that I must apply for phone-bank service in case I needed to freeze my bank accounts," Luo testified. "The Shanghai branch didn't deal with my report over the phone in time."

The banks argued they were not at fault because the phone-bank service was advertised on their Websites. Both also said Luo's carelessness resulted in the theft and subsequent loss.

Before Luo requested his account be frozen, 30,451 yuan had been withdrawn.

The court ruled the banks should protect capital, as well as inform and assist clients who establish a deposit contract. The Huangpu court subtracted the 30,451 yuan that was withdrawn before the theft was reported to reach the compensation amount of 37,611 yuan.

Source: Shanghai Daily News


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- China Forum
- PD Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News
Online marketplace of Manufacturers & Wholesalers

Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved