Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- China in brief 2004
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Ethnic minorities
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> China
UPDATED: 08:25, July 13, 2005
US court revokes Chinese businessman's lawsuit against Liaoning
font size    

The District Court of Columbia in the United States ruled on February 28 this year that the lawsuit against northeast China's Liaoning provincial government by businessman Yang Rong be revoked.

The US court cited the reason that it had no right to "exercise jurisdiction" over the case.

In August 2003, the aforementioned court agreed to handle the lawsuit filed by Yang, former board chairman of the Brilliance Group, against the provincial government of Liaoning, which took over the Brilliance Group's state-owned assets in March 2002.

Refusing to accept the ruling, Yang has lodged an appeal to the court of appeal, sources told Xinhua.

In another case, the lawsuit instigated by Yang at Supreme Court of Bermuda to claim Chinese state assets failed as well.

The lawsuit against the Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd.(CBA), the Chinese Financial Education Development Foundation and the Huacheng Automotive Group Holding Company Ltd., was turned down by the Supreme Court of Bermuda on December 31, 2003.

The civil case was brought to court in the name of the Broadsino Finance Company Ltd. who claimed that Broadsino was the holder of the CBA, and its shares had been unlawfully expropriated by the provincial government of Liaoning.

However, the Supreme Court of Bermuda said in its court ruling that "the plaintiff never owned any shares" in the defendant CBA.

Relevant departments were quoted by the sources as saying that the state-owned nature of the assets in the case is clear, and the assets are not allowed to be taken over "by anybody through any means."

"As the facts involved are clear and the legal relations are explicit as well, departments concerned are fully confident of winning all related cases.

Source: Xinhua


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- Text Version
- RSS Feeds
- China Forum
- Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News
Online marketplace of Manufacturers & Wholesalers

Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved