Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- China in brief 2004
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Ethnic minorities
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> Business
UPDATED: 16:58, February 10, 2006
Chinese battery producers win "337 investigation"
font size    

The case started from April 28, 2003, Energizer and Everead jointly filed a complaint with U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), charging seven Chinese battery companies including Sichuan Changhong, Fujian Nanfu, Ningbo Shuanglu with patent infringements of mercury-free alkaline batteries, requiring the USITC to institute the so-called "section 337 investigation".

After China Battery Industry Association learned the case, it launched technology researches on both Chinese and American battery products and invited experienced American lawyers to defend the case.

The USITC made a final ruling after three years investigation that the so-called mercury-free alkaline battery patent is invalid and Chinese battery companies did not constitute infringements.

By People's Daily Online


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- Text Version
- RSS Feeds
- China Forum
- Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News

Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved