Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- China in brief 2004
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Ethnic minorities
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> Opinion
UPDATED: 15:53, July 28, 2006
Article condemns Dalai's refusal to recognize Tibet as part of China
font size    

An article, recently published on the website of China Tibet Information Center, says Dalai Lama still refuses to recognize the fact that Tibet is part of China.

The signed article, written by Yedor, has analyzed the "middle way", advocated by Dalai Lama in recent years, pointing out that the so-called "middle way" actually goes against China's Constitution and law.

China's Constitution stipulates in its preface that the the People's Republic of China (PRC) is a multi-national country founded by peoples of various ethnic groups in the country. Article 4 of the Constitution goes further to say that various regions exercising national regional autonomy in China are an alienable part of the country.

However, Dalai Lama said in his "five points" that "Tibet was a completely independent state in 1949 when the People's Liberation Army entered". In his "March 10" statement of 1995, he said: "The reality of today is that Tibet is an occupied country under colonial rule".

At an Indian seminar called "support for Tibet", he declared: "Buddhism entered Tibet from India, and so did many other aspects of Indian culture. From this point of view, I hold that it is more reasonable for India to own sovereignty over Tibet than China."

In recent years, Dalai Lama has changed his tune by saying that "the issue can be turned over to historians for discussion; we should refrain from talking about the past, and instead focus on the future."

"We see that Dalai Lama publicly refuses the fact that Tibet has since the ancient times been a part of China, and then says that he does not have to talk about this issue. He does all these to impress the others he has made concession," the article said.

"As a matter of fact, however, he is turning a known-to-all historical fact and a political principle related to state sovereignty into a historical and academic question that exists and does not have to be discussed, " the article said.

"Admitting what Dalai Lama has said means acknowledgement regarding his statement that Tibet has been an occupied country after 1949," said the article. "The Central Government naturally is staunch in attitude and all people with a sober mind can see that what Dalai Lama does is his plan to dish out his 'Tibetan independence' when conditions ripen again according to his own standards," the article added.


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- Text Version
- RSS Feeds
- China Forum
- Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News
- Article urges Dalai to truly give up "Tibetan independence" policy

- On the 'Middle Way' of the Dalai Lama

Dic

Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved