Text Version
RSS Feeds
Newsletter
Home Forum Photos Features Newsletter Archive Employment
About US Help Site Map
SEARCH   About US FAQ Site Map Site News
  SERVICES
  -Text Version
  -RSS Feeds
  -Newsletter
  -News Archive
  -Give us feedback
  -Voices of Readers
  -Online community
  -China Biz info
  What's new
 -
 -
Environmental groups threaten to sue U.S. major port
+ -
12:16, February 07, 2008

 Related News
 California university town faces retaliation for anti-Marine policy
 U.S. ready for full ties with DPRK conditionally
 U.S. prosecutors seek tie in Societe Generale case
 U.S. to provide second shipment of fuel aid to DPRK
 U.S says agreement with Iraq not to include defense commitment
 Comment  Tell A Friend
 Print Format  Save Article
Two environmental groups on Wednesday threatened to sue the Port of Long Beach near downtown Los Angeles if it did not reduce diesel soot and smog.

The ultimatum from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the Coalition for a Safe Environment (CSE) gave the port 90 days to take action or face a federal lawsuit.

The lawsuit would be brought under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a law that allows a federal court to order a polluter to stop causing harm to the public and environment if imminent endangerment can be shown.

The ultimatum was delivered in a letter to Long Beach Mayor Bob Foster, Long Beach Harbor Commission President Mario Cordero and port Executive Director Richard Steinke.

The letter urged port authorities to immediately require that vessels switch to low-sulfur diesel fuel, a move that could result in higher fuel costs the industry has warned would be passed on to consumers of imported goods.

It also called on the port to limit expansion projects until it could prove to the satisfaction of a federal judge that such activities would not "at any time increase the level of hazardous diesel particulates emanating from the port."

"We are tired of listening to port authorities saying all the right things but doing little," said David Pettit, a senior attorney with the NRDC. "It's time for a new approach."

Port authorities declined to comment pending their attorneys' review of the letter. But Jack Kyser, chief economist with the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., expressed dismay over the legal tactic, which he said "could run afoul of regulations regarding international trade."

The environmental groups countered that the port can control dangerous emissions when ships are in port and can regulate the trucks, trains and warehouses that are part of the sprawling 105-billion-dollar operation, which accounts for 230,000 jobs regionwide.

Studies estimate that diesel exhaust from freight transport contributes to 2,400 premature deaths statewide each year, with 50percent of those deaths occurring in the South Coast Air Basin.

The legal challenge comes a year after the adjacent ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach passed a highly touted Clean Air Action Plan to slash port-generated pollution 45 percent by 2012.

Source: Xinhua



  Your Message:   Most Commented:

|About Peopledaily.com.cn | Advertise on site | Contact us | Site map | Job offer|
Copyright by People's Daily Online, All Rights Reserved

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/6351982.pdf